Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
September 3, 2011
Image Size
690 KB
Resolution
1920×1280
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
18,151 (11 today)
Favourites
243 (who?)
Comments
25
Downloads
796
×
Mk. XIV Centurion Heavy Tank by Ergrassa Mk. XIV Centurion Heavy Tank by Ergrassa

Mk. XIV Centurion Heavy Tank



type: heavy infantry tank
manufacturer: Vickers
in service: 2480-present
country of origin: Bretonia
used by: Bretonia

unit cost: about 280000 Geo
length: 9.2 meters
width: 4.9 meters
height: 3.1 meters
weight: 92 tonnes var.A2
crew: 6 with A37 tower, 5 with A40 tower
armor: 1300 / 900 / 650
shield: 22 0.45 MJ/sec emitters (9.9 MW total)

variant A (early)


A36 tower (armor: 700 / 300 / 500)
122mm L48 cannon
dual 11mm heavy machinegun
AT missile launcher

variant A2 (late)


A37 tower (armor: 1600 / 800 / 600)
122mm L52 cannon/launcher
dual 11mm heavy machinegun
2 scout drones / AA missiles
90mm plasma thrower

variant B


A40 tower (armor: 1100 / 1100 / 1100)
85mm L70 rapid fire railgun
Atomic Seven plasma thrower
2 scout drones / AA missiles
105mm howitzer

:bulletblue: 3Ds Max 2009, finalRender stage-1, Adobe Photoshop CS5
:bulletred: compound of Char B1, Mk IV Churchill and M26 Pershing
Add a Comment:
 
:iconlpjgpr:
This is fantastic. It's like WWII set in space, and I love it!
Reply
:iconunb3kann1:
█░░█░█░▀▀█▀▀░█▀█ ░ █▀█
█░░█░█░░░█░░░█▀▄ ░█▀▀█
▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀░▀░░░▀░ ▀░▀░░▀
░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█▀▀
░█▀▀ ░█▀▀ ░█ ░█
░▀▀▀ ░▀ ░░░▀ ░▀▀▀
.......................,,-~*~,,
......................./:.:.:.:.:.|
......................|;.;.;.;.;./
......................|.;.;.;.;.|
............._,,,,,_.).;.;.;.;.|
.........,,-":.:.:.:."~-,;.;.;.|
........(_,,,,---,,_:.:.);.;.;..",,
......,-":.:.:.:.:.""-,,/;.;.;.;.;.",
.....(:.__,,,,,,,,,___);.;.;.;.;.;|
...../"":.:.:.:.:.:.:¯""\;.;.;.;.;.,"
....\",__,,,,,,,,,,,__/;;;;;;;;;/\
.....\.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.);;;;;;;;;/:\
.......\,,,,,---~~~~;;;;;;;;,"::::\
.........."""~~--,,,,,,,,,,-"::::::::::\
...................\::::::::::::::::::::::
Reply
:iconcrona27:
Crona27 Aug 17, 2012
too bad those variants arent real. itd really be something if we had plasma and laser technology by 2030.
Reply
:iconvoidlord1:
well laser tech, more than likely, Laser weapons are at experimental usefulness now, so not long till we might be seeing them on the battlefield as standard weapons, of course against lasers, the best defence is a rock, literally. Plasma is alot harder, there really isnt that much development going into plasma yet
Reply
:iconcrona27:
Crona27 Nov 29, 2012
awesome. theyd better get on plasma and particle physics soon if we are ever gonna make it to alpha centauri in this generation... or the next one anyway.. also nanotechnology and nanomachines. OH thatd be a great use for tanks! in repairing armor i mean.
Reply
:iconvoidlord1:
Nanotech can also be used to make better armour, so stronger yet lighter. But literally plasma weapons are incredibly advanced, Mass drivers are an evolution of standard firearms, Particle beam weapons are an evolution of Mass Drivers and Ion, Plasma weapons are an evolution of particle beam weapons...
Reply
:iconeltf177:
Very nice, but the open area at the bottom rear of the turret is a horrible shot trap. I'd modify the turret to get rid of that unwanted feature.
Reply
:iconarklyte84826:
4.9m width. That makes turret 3m max. And 3000-2*1100=800mm in width inside. It a very little turret))
Reply
:iconergrassa:
Ergrassa Dec 12, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
it's not real armour thickness, it's equivalent armour strength =) real thickness is about 10 to 30 cm
Reply
:iconarklyte84826:
hmm, usually no one is putting equivalent armour strength in description(calculating it, keeping in mind all diffirencies in angles and materials, is quiet a problem)+I still don't see any hatches on the turret that may proof that there is someone inside it. If the cannon and machinegun are automated then there is no mistake in little space inside.
Reply
Add a Comment: