Shop More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
September 3, 2011
Image Size
690 KB
Resolution
1920×1280
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
23,923 (18 today)
Favourites
281 (who?)
Comments
26
Downloads
869
×
Mk. XIV Centurion Heavy Tank by Ergrassa Mk. XIV Centurion Heavy Tank by Ergrassa

Mk. XIV Centurion Heavy Tank



type: heavy infantry tank
manufacturer: Vickers
in service: 2480-present
country of origin: Bretonia
used by: Bretonia

unit cost: about 280000 Geo
length: 9.2 meters
width: 4.9 meters
height: 3.1 meters
weight: 92 tonnes var.A2
crew: 6 with A37 tower, 5 with A40 tower
armor: 1300 / 900 / 650
shield: 22 0.45 MJ/sec emitters (9.9 MW total)

variant A (early)


A36 tower (armor: 700 / 300 / 500)
122mm L48 cannon
dual 11mm heavy machinegun
AT missile launcher

variant A2 (late)


A37 tower (armor: 1600 / 800 / 600)
122mm L52 cannon/launcher
dual 11mm heavy machinegun
2 scout drones / AA missiles
90mm plasma thrower

variant B


A40 tower (armor: 1100 / 1100 / 1100)
85mm L70 rapid fire railgun
Atomic Seven plasma thrower
2 scout drones / AA missiles
105mm howitzer

:bulletblue: 3Ds Max 2009, finalRender stage-1, Adobe Photoshop CS5
:bulletred: compound of Char B1, Mk IV Churchill and M26 Pershing
Add a Comment:
 
:iconfai-kwan:
fai-kwan Featured By Owner Oct 14, 2014
Looks like you slapped a different turret on a larger Matilda/B1 hybrid. 
But that's in the description so eh, mm..
Reply
:iconlpjgpr:
LPJGPR Featured By Owner Apr 5, 2014
This is fantastic. It's like WWII set in space, and I love it!
Reply
:iconunb3kann1:
Unb3kann1 Featured By Owner Mar 1, 2014
█░░█░█░▀▀█▀▀░█▀█ ░ █▀█
█░░█░█░░░█░░░█▀▄ ░█▀▀█
▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀░▀░░░▀░ ▀░▀░░▀
░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█▀▀
░█▀▀ ░█▀▀ ░█ ░█
░▀▀▀ ░▀ ░░░▀ ░▀▀▀
.......................,,-~*~,,
......................./:.:.:.:.:.|
......................|;.;.;.;.;./
......................|.;.;.;.;.|
............._,,,,,_.).;.;.;.;.|
.........,,-":.:.:.:."~-,;.;.;.|
........(_,,,,---,,_:.:.);.;.;..",,
......,-":.:.:.:.:.""-,,/;.;.;.;.;.",
.....(:.__,,,,,,,,,___);.;.;.;.;.;|
...../"":.:.:.:.:.:.:¯""\;.;.;.;.;.,"
....\",__,,,,,,,,,,,__/;;;;;;;;;/\
.....\.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.);;;;;;;;;/:\
.......\,,,,,---~~~~;;;;;;;;,"::::\
.........."""~~--,,,,,,,,,,-"::::::::::\
...................\::::::::::::::::::::::
Reply
:iconcrona27:
Crona27 Featured By Owner Aug 17, 2012
too bad those variants arent real. itd really be something if we had plasma and laser technology by 2030.
Reply
:iconvoidlord1:
Voidlord1 Featured By Owner Nov 29, 2012
well laser tech, more than likely, Laser weapons are at experimental usefulness now, so not long till we might be seeing them on the battlefield as standard weapons, of course against lasers, the best defence is a rock, literally. Plasma is alot harder, there really isnt that much development going into plasma yet
Reply
:iconcrona27:
Crona27 Featured By Owner Nov 29, 2012
awesome. theyd better get on plasma and particle physics soon if we are ever gonna make it to alpha centauri in this generation... or the next one anyway.. also nanotechnology and nanomachines. OH thatd be a great use for tanks! in repairing armor i mean.
Reply
:iconvoidlord1:
Voidlord1 Featured By Owner Nov 29, 2012
Nanotech can also be used to make better armour, so stronger yet lighter. But literally plasma weapons are incredibly advanced, Mass drivers are an evolution of standard firearms, Particle beam weapons are an evolution of Mass Drivers and Ion, Plasma weapons are an evolution of particle beam weapons...
Reply
:iconeltf177:
eltf177 Featured By Owner Aug 1, 2012
Very nice, but the open area at the bottom rear of the turret is a horrible shot trap. I'd modify the turret to get rid of that unwanted feature.
Reply
:iconarklyte84826:
Arklyte84826 Featured By Owner Jul 21, 2012
4.9m width. That makes turret 3m max. And 3000-2*1100=800mm in width inside. It a very little turret))
Reply
:iconergrassa:
Ergrassa Featured By Owner Dec 12, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
it's not real armour thickness, it's equivalent armour strength =) real thickness is about 10 to 30 cm
Reply
Add a Comment: